Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4621 - 4630 of 29772 for des.
Search results 4621 - 4630 of 29772 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Babbitts appeals. Standard of Review ¶9 “We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109300 - 2014-03-19
. Babbitts appeals. Standard of Review ¶9 “We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109300 - 2014-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
found Parsons guilty of all four offenses. Parsons timely filed a notice of de novo appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555803 - 2022-08-17
found Parsons guilty of all four offenses. Parsons timely filed a notice of de novo appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555803 - 2022-08-17
State v. Aaron Leslie Harmer
constitutionality is a question of law that we review de novo. See Molitor, 210 Wis. 2d at 418. The Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
constitutionality is a question of law that we review de novo. See Molitor, 210 Wis. 2d at 418. The Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2155 - 2005-03-31
Estate of Steven M. Anderson v. Abraham J. Pellett
. The Estate appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25586 - 2006-08-08
. The Estate appeals. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25586 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
State v. Shawn Virlee
review de novo. Id. To resolve this issue, we must interpret § 980.02(2)(ag), which also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4807 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. Id. To resolve this issue, we must interpret § 980.02(2)(ag), which also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4807 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert J. Trokan
of the parties. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 96. On appeal, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
of the parties. Michels, 150 Wis. 2d at 96. On appeal, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6532 - 2005-03-31
State v. James R. Walz
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6715 - 2005-03-31
Thomas Feller v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company
review a summary judgment decision de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Rural Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6722 - 2005-03-31
review a summary judgment decision de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Rural Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6722 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184169 - 2017-09-21
factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184169 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Lynn M. Hron Clerk of Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564260 - 2022-09-09
To: Hon. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Lynn M. Hron Clerk of Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564260 - 2022-09-09