Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4621 - 4630 of 64839 for timed.
Search results 4621 - 4630 of 64839 for timed.
COURT OF APPEALS
by the Department of Corrections that it was not possible to execute the court’s order because by the time the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
by the Department of Corrections that it was not possible to execute the court’s order because by the time the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50567 - 2010-06-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in January 2022, they were promptly refiled, and the case was ongoing as of the time of the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
in January 2022, they were promptly refiled, and the case was ongoing as of the time of the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was at that time set for trial starting December 13, 2010. The court held a hearing on November 29, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107795 - 2017-09-21
was at that time set for trial starting December 13, 2010. The court held a hearing on November 29, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107795 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
his potential defenses at the time he entered his pleas. We directed counsel to review that issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
his potential defenses at the time he entered his pleas. We directed counsel to review that issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91454 - 2013-01-07
CA Blank Order
was in McCoy’s hand at the time it fired, but he argues that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103700 - 2013-11-06
was in McCoy’s hand at the time it fired, but he argues that there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103700 - 2013-11-06
Richard J. Schleife v. Marquip, Inc.
, 1992. Marquip argues that Schleife was not employed during that time because Schleife failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8709 - 2005-03-31
, 1992. Marquip argues that Schleife was not employed during that time because Schleife failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8709 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
modification motion, Barkley argued that at the time of his June 2011 arrest, he was taking a statin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122955 - 2014-10-08
modification motion, Barkley argued that at the time of his June 2011 arrest, he was taking a statin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122955 - 2014-10-08
District II/IV March 1, 2013 To: Hon. Anthony G. Milisauskas Circuit Court Judge Kenosha County C...
credit for the time he spent in custody between April and November 2010. Tucker, through appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
credit for the time he spent in custody between April and November 2010. Tucker, through appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93596 - 2013-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at the time of the photo.” With respect to the “HS kissing KJ’s exposed breast photo,” the probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673157 - 2023-07-06
at the time of the photo.” With respect to the “HS kissing KJ’s exposed breast photo,” the probable cause
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673157 - 2023-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Dale H. Krause
in case number 98-CF-123 was jail time as a condition of probation. At a postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15958 - 2017-09-21
in case number 98-CF-123 was jail time as a condition of probation. At a postconviction motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15958 - 2017-09-21