Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46211 - 46220 of 57632 for id.
Search results 46211 - 46220 of 57632 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion. Id. In this case, the circuit court applied the standard sentencing factors and explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909689 - 2025-02-04
discretion. Id. In this case, the circuit court applied the standard sentencing factors and explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909689 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
or because … it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.’” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092490 - 2026-03-18
or because … it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties.’” Id., ¶40 (quoting Rosado v. State, 70
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1092490 - 2026-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
as a repeater, and may do so only after finding that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater, and may do so only after finding that the defendant is in fact a repeater. Id. at 619-20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29188 - 2007-05-29
unless a sufficient reason for failing to raise the issue is presented. Id. “[D]ue process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29188 - 2007-05-29
Martha Sue Gatten v. Eileen Perket
contempt of court, rather than punish the contemnor. Id., ¶¶26-27; see Wis. Stat. § 785.01(2) & (3). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25937 - 2006-07-17
contempt of court, rather than punish the contemnor. Id., ¶¶26-27; see Wis. Stat. § 785.01(2) & (3). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25937 - 2006-07-17
State v. David T. O.
are protected from the burden of relitigating an identical issue. Id. at 512, 557 N.W.2d at 87. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12148 - 2005-03-31
are protected from the burden of relitigating an identical issue. Id. at 512, 557 N.W.2d at 87. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12148 - 2005-03-31
Dover Lake View Estates LLC v. Town of Dover
of the approving authority was arbitrary, unreasonable or discriminatory. See id. at 812, 503 N.W.2d at 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10234 - 2005-03-31
of the approving authority was arbitrary, unreasonable or discriminatory. See id. at 812, 503 N.W.2d at 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10234 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is by way of certiorari review to the court of conviction.” Id. at 583. No. 2022AP778-CRNM 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
is by way of certiorari review to the court of conviction.” Id. at 583. No. 2022AP778-CRNM 4
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=631927 - 2023-03-15
[PDF]
James Sarlund v. Kimberly Mork
acted out of bad motive or improper purpose. Id. at 362- 63, 241 N.W.2d at 165-66. The appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9984 - 2017-09-19
acted out of bad motive or improper purpose. Id. at 362- 63, 241 N.W.2d at 165-66. The appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9984 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
obligation.” Id., ¶1. We held that the circuit court, acting as the sentencing court, lacks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216177 - 2018-08-01
obligation.” Id., ¶1. We held that the circuit court, acting as the sentencing court, lacks
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216177 - 2018-08-01