Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46221 - 46230 of 84311 for case number.
Search results 46221 - 46230 of 84311 for case number.
State v. Terry T.
2003 WI App 21 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2502 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5682 - 2005-03-31
2003 WI App 21 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-2502 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5682 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
verdict reflects an accurate statement of the law applicable to the issues of fact in a given case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
verdict reflects an accurate statement of the law applicable to the issues of fact in a given case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815329 - 2024-07-09
CA Blank Order
for admission of expert testimony, apply to this case? (3) Did the court improperly require Fleming to wear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132741 - 2015-01-12
for admission of expert testimony, apply to this case? (3) Did the court improperly require Fleming to wear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132741 - 2015-01-12
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
entered an Alford plea in November 1994. He was sentenced in both cases on November 10, 1994.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20
entered an Alford plea in November 1994. He was sentenced in both cases on November 10, 1994.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. He contends that his trial attorney was ineffective by repeatedly adjourning the case, delaying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
. He contends that his trial attorney was ineffective by repeatedly adjourning the case, delaying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a third time. In our most recent decision, we detailed the facts of Mathis’s case. See State v. Mathis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024376 - 2025-10-21
for a third time. In our most recent decision, we detailed the facts of Mathis’s case. See State v. Mathis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024376 - 2025-10-21
State v. Joseph F. Rizzo
2001 WI App 57 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16314 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 57 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16314 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Hon. James R. Kieffer presided at this hearing and over other proceedings in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142985 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The Hon. James R. Kieffer presided at this hearing and over other proceedings in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142985 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case. Counsel also felt Andrews’ testimony was not necessary to establish Robinson’s defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258179 - 2020-04-21
of the case. Counsel also felt Andrews’ testimony was not necessary to establish Robinson’s defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258179 - 2020-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be tried fairly.” Id. at 347. We noted “[t]here will be cases, however, where the fact of amnesia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
to be tried fairly.” Id. at 347. We noted “[t]here will be cases, however, where the fact of amnesia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29