Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46271 - 46280 of 76979 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] State v. John C. Zittlow
. In [another case], we specifically recognized that the [S]tate does not have to prove the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25757 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marvell Clayton
the State’s recommendation … [i]s in fact lenient and that the full amount of reconfinement time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25090 - 2006-05-08

State v. John M. Shelley
for Waukesha County: lee s. dreyfus, jr., Judge. Affirmed. SNYDER, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12637 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Arthur W. Sanger, Jr.
.’s motion to suppress evidence based on 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5330 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] ABKA Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
OF WISCONSIN, CREATED BY S. 15.34, STATS., AND GENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY, INC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11954 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jedd T.M.
period of delay resulting from other legal actions concerning the child, including an examination under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9843 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that § 301.45(1d)(b)’s registration requirement is unconstitutional as applied to him. We next turn to Davis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754942 - 2024-01-25

February Table of unpublished opinions
. Matthew S. Carlson† 01/26/05
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35 - 2005-03-07

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
and convincing evidence.” Ann M.M. v. Rob S., 176 Wis. 2d 673, 682, 500 N.W.2d 649 (1993). After a bench
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96392 - 2014-09-15

_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
. 12-23-2014 Affirmed 2014AP000493 CR State v. Joseph S. Cali
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134852 - 2015-02-08