Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 29926 for des.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 29926 for des.
[PDF]
State v. James R. Walz
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
a judgment of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 DEININGER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6715 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
. No. 2023AP2339 6 review de novo.” Waukesha County v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829695 - 2024-07-23
[PDF]
WI App 185
of law that we review de novo. Haase, 293 Wis. 2d 322, ¶5. Our interpretation of § 973.20 is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34461 - 2014-09-15
of law that we review de novo. Haase, 293 Wis. 2d 322, ¶5. Our interpretation of § 973.20 is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34461 - 2014-09-15
Donald Strassman v. Robert J. Muranyi
judgment de novo, using the methodology set out in § 802.08(2), Stats. See M & I First Nat'l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14678 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, using the methodology set out in § 802.08(2), Stats. See M & I First Nat'l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14678 - 2005-03-31
Fariba Baylis v. State
and application of the undisputed facts to that standard, all of which are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15486 - 2005-03-31
and application of the undisputed facts to that standard, all of which are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15486 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 72
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48968 - 2010-06-29
¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48968 - 2010-06-29
Thomas M.P. v. Kimberly J.L.
and interpretation of a statute and its application to the facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10512 - 2005-03-31
and interpretation of a statute and its application to the facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10512 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35008 - 2011-06-14
as the circuit court and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 314-15, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35008 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103505 - 2017-09-21
review de novo the circuit court’s summary-judgment decision, and apply the governing standards “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103505 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman D. Stapleton
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion on both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2597 - 2005-03-31