Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 20869 for word.
Search results 4631 - 4640 of 20869 for word.
State v. Edward J. Schwartz
. [Prosecutor]: So, in other words, when you were having some conversation with [K.M.S.], you thought that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15159 - 2005-03-31
. [Prosecutor]: So, in other words, when you were having some conversation with [K.M.S.], you thought that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15159 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 132
that there was some type of -- got into an argument with some other males and that he used the word beastly. We kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53658 - 2010-09-28
that there was some type of -- got into an argument with some other males and that he used the word beastly. We kind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53658 - 2010-09-28
[PDF]
WI APP 51
or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35716 - 2014-09-15
or specially defined words are given their technical or special definitions. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35716 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ‘not hypothetical facts in other situations.’” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted). In other words, the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
, ‘not hypothetical facts in other situations.’” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted). In other words, the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
WI App 61
). They dispute, however, whether the word “shall” in the relevant portion of the statute is mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248293 - 2019-12-06
). They dispute, however, whether the word “shall” in the relevant portion of the statute is mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248293 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
Susan Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank Wisconsin
. We interpret that to mean legally resisted ….” Id. at 88. Thus, a “Crummey provision” is wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6024 - 2017-09-19
. We interpret that to mean legally resisted ….” Id. at 88. Thus, a “Crummey provision” is wording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judge’s reasons and portrays the court as an advocate’s tool, even when the judge adds some words of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99684 - 2014-09-15
the judge’s reasons and portrays the court as an advocate’s tool, even when the judge adds some words of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99684 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David M. Bliss v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
. “An interpretation is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, it is clearly contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12583 - 2017-09-21
. “An interpretation is unreasonable if it directly contravenes the words of the statute, it is clearly contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to as the “complainant.” In that capacity, Zielinski, in Coralic’s words, “presented the case in favor of revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
to as the “complainant.” In that capacity, Zielinski, in Coralic’s words, “presented the case in favor of revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70007 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Oscar J. Williams v. Patrick J. Fiedler
reports and the district attorney’s letter, does not, in the words of the judge’s written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17670 - 2017-09-21
reports and the district attorney’s letter, does not, in the words of the judge’s written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17670 - 2017-09-21