Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46301 - 46310 of 62078 for child support.
Search results 46301 - 46310 of 62078 for child support.
State v. Jerald R. Allen
not address the State's alternative arguments to support the trial court's decision. Also, Allen does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11041 - 2005-03-31
not address the State's alternative arguments to support the trial court's decision. Also, Allen does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11041 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
considered mitigating factors, like Carpenter’s family support, his good work history, and the fact that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
considered mitigating factors, like Carpenter’s family support, his good work history, and the fact that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
CA Blank Order
363.. To support the repeater allegation, Stull admitted he had been convicted of four specific prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93152 - 2013-02-26
363.. To support the repeater allegation, Stull admitted he had been convicted of four specific prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93152 - 2013-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and refusal to speak, but that his affect was actually the result of his mental illness. In support, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98489 - 2013-06-24
and refusal to speak, but that his affect was actually the result of his mental illness. In support, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98489 - 2013-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
plea was coerced. We concluded that the record did not support his assertion that he entered the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
plea was coerced. We concluded that the record did not support his assertion that he entered the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
State v. Toua Yang
supported the trial court’s exercise of discretion, we reject Yang’s arguments and affirm his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
supported the trial court’s exercise of discretion, we reject Yang’s arguments and affirm his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13185 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
expectation of finality. He does not cite any legal authority that supports this argument. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271533 - 2020-07-23
expectation of finality. He does not cite any legal authority that supports this argument. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271533 - 2020-07-23
[PDF]
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Nathan W. Schley
, 475 N.W.2d 148 (1991), to support his position. However, the language in Swanson has since been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26214 - 2017-09-21
, 475 N.W.2d 148 (1991), to support his position. However, the language in Swanson has since been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
in support of and in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. The bank's sole evidentiary proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10116 - 2017-09-19
in support of and in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. The bank's sole evidentiary proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10116 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to support the jury’s guilty verdict. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20
to support the jury’s guilty verdict. We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297223 - 2020-10-20