Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46351 - 46360 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46351 - 46360 of 82663 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
Dale Vercauteren v. County of Oconto
ordinances is limited to cases exhibiting abuse of discretion, excess of power, or error of law. Buhler v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19
ordinances is limited to cases exhibiting abuse of discretion, excess of power, or error of law. Buhler v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2905 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bonny Treutelaar
, 20 (1987). Wisconsin has codified the exception relevant to this case in § 968.11, Stats., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11688 - 2005-03-31
, 20 (1987). Wisconsin has codified the exception relevant to this case in § 968.11, Stats., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
. The facts of the case are undisputed. At approximately 7:20 a.m. on October 1, 1996, the Shawano County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
. The facts of the case are undisputed. At approximately 7:20 a.m. on October 1, 1996, the Shawano County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
[MS WORD]
FA-4161VA: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment - without Minor Children
Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name of the county in which this case
/formdisplay/FA-4161VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4161VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
Petitioner A: Respondent/Joint Petitioner B: Enter the name of the county in which this case
/formdisplay/FA-4161VA.doc?formNumber=FA-4161VA&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2024-01-08
State v. Phillip C. Lamson
the District Attorney would have to prove in order to convict you if this case went to trial? DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
the District Attorney would have to prove in order to convict you if this case went to trial? DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case by pleading no contest to a non-criminal ordinance violation for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32519 - 2014-09-15
in this case by pleading no contest to a non-criminal ordinance violation for operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32519 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Glass
. ¶8 “The validity of any photographic identification requires a case-by- case application of the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4323 - 2017-09-19
. ¶8 “The validity of any photographic identification requires a case-by- case application of the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4323 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4563 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4564 - 2017-09-19
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) coverage. ¶4 The case was bifurcated into two parts—a merits portion and an insurance coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555584 - 2022-08-16
) coverage. ¶4 The case was bifurcated into two parts—a merits portion and an insurance coverage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555584 - 2022-08-16