Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46351 - 46360 of 68502 for did.
Search results 46351 - 46360 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
if the defendant can allege that he or she did not know or understand that aspect of his or her plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219283 - 2018-09-18
if the defendant can allege that he or she did not know or understand that aspect of his or her plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219283 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
accepted the information as a new factor, it determined the new factor did not justify modifying Burciaga
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21
accepted the information as a new factor, it determined the new factor did not justify modifying Burciaga
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138018 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kay H. Dawson
to WIS. STAT. § 346.57(5). It is undisputed that the traffic signs did not comply with the manual’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3378 - 2017-09-19
to WIS. STAT. § 346.57(5). It is undisputed that the traffic signs did not comply with the manual’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3378 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100806 - 2017-09-21
because it did not seek restitution in the criminal case against him. He also argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100806 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Randy Duncan v. Kenneth Gillingham
subrogation interest. The County did not answer the complaint. Nor did it appear at a scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
subrogation interest. The County did not answer the complaint. Nor did it appear at a scheduling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11008 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Borowitz
conclude that it did, and therefore affirm. ¶2 The search warrant application of Detective Gary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3686 - 2017-09-19
conclude that it did, and therefore affirm. ¶2 The search warrant application of Detective Gary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3686 - 2017-09-19
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Sostarich
: Dissented: Not Participating: PROSSER and BUTLER, JR., J.J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
: Dissented: Not Participating: PROSSER and BUTLER, JR., J.J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24518 - 2006-03-16
Challoner Morse McBride v. Eulalia I. Addison
restitution, she did not. However, McBride subsequently requested the trial court in the criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9916 - 2005-03-31
restitution, she did not. However, McBride subsequently requested the trial court in the criminal case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. The circuit court denied Hardin’s motion, and he did not appeal. Next, Hardin, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458938 - 2021-12-07
postconviction motion. The circuit court denied Hardin’s motion, and he did not appeal. Next, Hardin, pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458938 - 2021-12-07
State v. Walter W. Lockhart
did not object to a series of questions asked of a police officer about whether the rifle Walter had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3439 - 2005-03-31
did not object to a series of questions asked of a police officer about whether the rifle Walter had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3439 - 2005-03-31