Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46361 - 46370 of 57632 for id.

Karl Julius James v. Michael J. Sullivan
or oppressive and the evidence of record substantiates the decision.” Id. James first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11425 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael L. Sellers
the controlling factor, joinder decisions would be decided by defendants rather than trial courts. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9319 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
” (emphasis added)); id., ¶36 (when “the court of appeals elects to impose the drastic sanction of summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694634 - 2023-08-24

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id. ¶4 Robinson first contends that her trial attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26777 - 2006-10-11

Eric G. Hanson v. Town of Richland Board of Review
not be ignored by the Board. Id. Therefore, the trial court correctly set aside the Board’s decision. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25179 - 2006-05-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. at 514. ¶7 Shellow is not persuasive because here the circuit court did not rely on the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366110 - 2021-05-13

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Id. M.M.L. is no longer subject to the commitment extension and related medication order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180087 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Village of Fontana v. Lynn M. Zais
questions of law de novo without deference to the trial court. Id. The statute provides, in pertinent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5372 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conflicts in the testimony. Id. at 503-04. Here, the jury heard detailed testimony about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796479 - 2024-05-07

State v. Jason Frederick Work
that the sentencing disparity was arbitrary or based on improper considerations. See id. In this case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14554 - 2005-03-31