Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46371 - 46380 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46371 - 46380 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
evidence be relevant to an issue in the case” as required by § 904.01, Stats. State v. Alsteen, 108 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
evidence be relevant to an issue in the case” as required by § 904.01, Stats. State v. Alsteen, 108 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
of the crime and to provide a complete explanation of the case.” Id., ¶58. It also found that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22
of the crime and to provide a complete explanation of the case.” Id., ¶58. It also found that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment on the first count, consecutive to his revocation on a different case, and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
of imprisonment on the first count, consecutive to his revocation on a different case, and five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2013-05-13
[PDF]
WI APP 146
2009 WI APP 146 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40489 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 146 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1756
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40489 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carole B. Miller v. General Motors Corporation
claim. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict awarding Miller no damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10879 - 2017-09-20
claim. The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict awarding Miller no damages
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10879 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
there has been no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
there has been no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
State v. Pamela T.
, Allen K. and Nicole K. She claims: (1) the circuit court lost jurisdiction over the case when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13504 - 2005-03-31
, Allen K. and Nicole K. She claims: (1) the circuit court lost jurisdiction over the case when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13504 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Avery
to the homicide, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
to the homicide, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16020 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
reject Peter’s contention that our discussion in S.D.S. required the court in this case to exclude all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4565 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether that case had been resolved, Hoffman responded, “I’m pretty sure. I looked on CCAP prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181686 - 2017-09-21
whether that case had been resolved, Hoffman responded, “I’m pretty sure. I looked on CCAP prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181686 - 2017-09-21