Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4641 - 4650 of 16429 for commentating.
Search results 4641 - 4650 of 16429 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. Noel Davila
discretion “in imposing an excessive sentence where … the comments … at sentencing demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19
discretion “in imposing an excessive sentence where … the comments … at sentencing demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or disparaging” comments. United States v. Tovar-Pina, 713 F.3d 1143, 1148 (7th Cir. 2013). In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123253 - 2017-09-21
, or disparaging” comments. United States v. Tovar-Pina, 713 F.3d 1143, 1148 (7th Cir. 2013). In addition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123253 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ramiah A. Whiteside
Whiteside. After imposing sentence, the trial court offhandedly commented to Whiteside that he believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10106 - 2017-09-19
Whiteside. After imposing sentence, the trial court offhandedly commented to Whiteside that he believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10106 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Milton L. Reed
sentencing policy. Reed points to the trial court’s comments that Reed “got initially the benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15162 - 2017-09-21
sentencing policy. Reed points to the trial court’s comments that Reed “got initially the benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee County
of a termination hearing and, in particular, has not even commented on (1) whether a termination hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13912 - 2014-09-15
of a termination hearing and, in particular, has not even commented on (1) whether a termination hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13912 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in Fond du Lac, Nommensen made comments about Kayla’s developing breasts and would apologize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
in Fond du Lac, Nommensen made comments about Kayla’s developing breasts and would apologize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67746 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) improperly commented on whether witnesses were telling the truth or lying, (2) misstated the legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787980 - 2024-04-11
) improperly commented on whether witnesses were telling the truth or lying, (2) misstated the legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787980 - 2024-04-11
2006 WI App 247
to purchase Frederick’s share for the same amount; however, Frederick’s later comments also indicate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27255 - 2006-12-19
to purchase Frederick’s share for the same amount; however, Frederick’s later comments also indicate that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27255 - 2006-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 445, 454, 276 N.W.2d 784 (1979). The prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
Wis. 2d 445, 454, 276 N.W.2d 784 (1979). The prosecutor may comment on the evidence, detail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56964 - 2010-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 29, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
of the jury, the State addressed Juror Number 34’s comment. Both the trial court and Shirley’s counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92113 - 2013-01-28
of the jury, the State addressed Juror Number 34’s comment. Both the trial court and Shirley’s counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92113 - 2013-01-28