Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4641 - 4650 of 19223 for inmates search.
Search results 4641 - 4650 of 19223 for inmates search.
State v. Bill Paul Marquardt
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1232 - 2005-02-07
discovery. Specifically: (1) Does the search warrant application in this case meet the third test set out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1232 - 2005-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Bill P. Marquardt
. Specifically: Nos. 04-0958-CR 04-1609-CR 2 (1) Does the search warrant application
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
. Specifically: Nos. 04-0958-CR 04-1609-CR 2 (1) Does the search warrant application
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1231 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 25
found pursuant to a search of his No. 2018AP1209-CR 2 vehicle following his arrest for OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
found pursuant to a search of his No. 2018AP1209-CR 2 vehicle following his arrest for OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239468 - 2019-08-13
[PDF]
State v. Jerry C.O.
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer Gary Cole testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11213 - 2017-09-19
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues that evidence seized from his vehicle should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30244 - 2014-09-15
search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues that evidence seized from his vehicle should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30244 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry C.O.
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15