Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46401 - 46410 of 84349 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 46401 - 46410 of 84349 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
the case for review. The supreme court affirmed the decision of this court, concluding that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
the case for review. The supreme court affirmed the decision of this court, concluding that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29207 - 2007-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
responds that, under case law providing several factors to consider for weapons in vehicles, weapons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72369 - 2011-10-19
responds that, under case law providing several factors to consider for weapons in vehicles, weapons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72369 - 2011-10-19
State v. Molli A. Huling
Whether the facts of a given case constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2303 - 2005-03-31
Whether the facts of a given case constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2303 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
not be the sole determinant of probable cause in an operating while intoxicated case. But that is not what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9210 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of acquittal. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the State’s case‑in‑chief to support a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
of acquittal. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence in the State’s case‑in‑chief to support a guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
Phaedra P. v. Dennis A.
of Jurisdiction (Order) finding that “the State of Texas is the most appropriate forum in this case and hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
of Jurisdiction (Order) finding that “the State of Texas is the most appropriate forum in this case and hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The underlying relevant facts are as follows. The victim in the case alleged that La Dousier had penis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28816 - 2014-09-15
. The underlying relevant facts are as follows. The victim in the case alleged that La Dousier had penis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28816 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stacy L. Blunt
, Blunt argues that Bentley does not apply to the instant case because Bentley involved a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
, Blunt argues that Bentley does not apply to the instant case because Bentley involved a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on parole eligibility as a factor in determining sentence in this case, and therefore, the defendant’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126926 - 2017-09-21
on parole eligibility as a factor in determining sentence in this case, and therefore, the defendant’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126926 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul L. Minnig
. The State appeals. DISCUSSION ¶4 The issue in this case is whether the frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals. DISCUSSION ¶4 The issue in this case is whether the frozen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7466 - 2005-03-31