Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46421 - 46430 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

State v. David William Newbury
of the prospective jurors indicated that they had some knowledge of the case through exposure to media stories
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8719 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Phillip C. Lamson
to prove in order to convict you if this case went to trial? DEFENDANT: Yes, he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10189 - 2017-09-20

State v. Dale Iversen
. Ellis did not make any appearances in Iversen’s case. Thomson appeared with and represented Iversen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14540 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
criminal case, committing him to 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744598 - 2023-12-28

[PDF] State of Wisconsin ex rel., v. David H. Schwarz
2001 WI App 56 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-2945
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16193 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
parental responsibility, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.415(6). The case was initially set for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191583 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James W. Pusel
of the Informing the Accused form before the intoxilyzer test is automatically admissible. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9575 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such statement, and denied that a CHIPS petition was ever prepared in this case. No. 2010AP2515-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76543 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
exists when, under the totality of the circumstances, “the facts of the case would warrant a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108799 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] NOTICE
, commands production of the prisoner “forthwith or at a day certain, as the case may require” together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31050 - 2014-09-15