Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46421 - 46430 of 57632 for id.
Search results 46421 - 46430 of 57632 for id.
Allen C. Orth v. Walworth County
court, that court’s reasoning may assist us. See id. ¶7 It is undisputed that Orth’s parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15475 - 2005-03-31
court, that court’s reasoning may assist us. See id. ¶7 It is undisputed that Orth’s parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15475 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for the sentence selected by the trial court. Id. at 99. Here, the sentencing court indicated that it gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30278 - 2007-09-17
for the sentence selected by the trial court. Id. at 99. Here, the sentencing court indicated that it gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30278 - 2007-09-17
State v. Ronald L. Baskin
a sentence modification is addressed to the trial court’s discretion. See id. ANALYSIS ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15891 - 2005-03-31
a sentence modification is addressed to the trial court’s discretion. See id. ANALYSIS ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
results. Id. In reviewing such a motion, the circuit court must order the DNA testing requested if all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
results. Id. In reviewing such a motion, the circuit court must order the DNA testing requested if all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728336 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
Carl Eichorn v. Coakley Brothers Company
, and present an argument on the issues.” Id. ¶7 Eichorn’s “brief” does not comply with the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
, and present an argument on the issues.” Id. ¶7 Eichorn’s “brief” does not comply with the minimum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
Robert M. Pace v. Oneida County
to the hearing. See id. ¶6 The court properly exercised its discretion when it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15875 - 2005-03-31
to the hearing. See id. ¶6 The court properly exercised its discretion when it imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15875 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Stephen Greer
of the offense, the character of the offender, and the need for public protection. Id. at 427, 415 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
of the offense, the character of the offender, and the need for public protection. Id. at 427, 415 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11767 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Andrew J. Kojis v. Jerry Rosnow
notice of the adverse possessor's exclusive dominion to the owner or the public. Id. at 336, 276 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8895 - 2017-09-19
notice of the adverse possessor's exclusive dominion to the owner or the public. Id. at 336, 276 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8895 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exists for its decision. Id. at 617. A court properly exercises its discretion when it employs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1105302 - 2026-04-16
exists for its decision. Id. at 617. A court properly exercises its discretion when it employs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1105302 - 2026-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion. Id., ¶9. In reviewing this matter, our analysis does not turn on whether Berry’s claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499170 - 2022-03-29
motion. Id., ¶9. In reviewing this matter, our analysis does not turn on whether Berry’s claims were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499170 - 2022-03-29