Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46431 - 46440 of 83291 for simple case search.
Search results 46431 - 46440 of 83291 for simple case search.
Rule Order
No. 14-02 07-11C In the Matter of the Review of the Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148093 - 2015-08-31
No. 14-02 07-11C In the Matter of the Review of the Discretionary Transfer of Cases to Tribal Court
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148093 - 2015-08-31
Frontsheet
2013 WI 41 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP133-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96911 - 2013-05-15
2013 WI 41 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP133-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96911 - 2013-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a State Crime Lab DNA analyst who had not performed the DNA analysis done in his case. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87370 - 2012-09-24
a State Crime Lab DNA analyst who had not performed the DNA analysis done in his case. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87370 - 2012-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we No. 2019AP1068-CR 2 conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319464 - 2020-12-30
, we No. 2019AP1068-CR 2 conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319464 - 2020-12-30
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
are law of the case and that Casteel’s sentence was not harsh or unconscionable. We reject Casteel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14220 - 2014-09-15
are law of the case and that Casteel’s sentence was not harsh or unconscionable. We reject Casteel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14220 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas K. Uhde
accepted the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
accepted the case, the State submitted a brief reversing its position on Uhde’s burglary misstatement claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5918 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial counsel and postconviction counsel had concluded their representation in this case. Neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64234 - 2014-09-15
trial counsel and postconviction counsel had concluded their representation in this case. Neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64234 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
matter jurisdiction to hear his case because it failed to obtain a petition of waiver from the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76223 - 2012-01-09
matter jurisdiction to hear his case because it failed to obtain a petition of waiver from the juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76223 - 2012-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision in Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985). In that case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113460 - 2014-06-02
court’s decision in Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. 2d 372, 376 N.W.2d 839 (1985). In that case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113460 - 2014-06-02