Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46461 - 46470 of 83001 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
there has been no judicial consideration of the merits and the interest of deciding the particular case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09

State v. Richard C. Plank
2005 WI App 109 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2280-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17796 - 2005-05-24

Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
the sanction ultimately caused dismissal of the case. See Schneller v. St. Mary's Hosp. Med. Ctr., 162 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12025 - 2005-03-31

State v. John F. Draves
house, Draves was charged with making threats to harm the social worker involved in the case. Draves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David William Newbury
that they had some knowledge of the case through exposure to media stories and newspaper accounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8719 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to provide him with all necessary information and for not fully investigating the case. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24

COURT OF APPEALS
, the parent has made a prima facie case that the admission was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76202 - 2012-01-10

COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous…. .... … “The question of probable cause must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124310 - 2014-10-15

Oak Hill Development Corporation v. Board of Review for the City of Oak Creek
. Additionally, interpreting the Manual in this case to exclude the use of the Development Method valuation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12671 - 2005-03-31

State v. Phillip C. Lamson
the District Attorney would have to prove in order to convict you if this case went to trial? DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10189 - 2005-03-31