Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 77817 for j o e y ' s.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 77817 for j o e y ' s.
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher E. Townsend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30929 - 2007-11-20
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Christopher E. Townsend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30929 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. THOMAS E. BUNTROCK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32983 - 2014-09-15
. THOMAS E. BUNTROCK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32983 - 2014-09-15
[MS WORD]
JD-1763B: Order Concerning Recoupment
was filed on [Date] . THE COURT ORDERS: 1. The parent(s) requesting review
/formdisplay/JD-1763B.doc?formNumber=JD-1763B&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-02-02
was filed on [Date] . THE COURT ORDERS: 1. The parent(s) requesting review
/formdisplay/JD-1763B.doc?formNumber=JD-1763B&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Moton
in an information, which also included crimes allegedly committed against Cortney T., Joan S., and Nicole B. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2243 - 2017-09-19
in an information, which also included crimes allegedly committed against Cortney T., Joan S., and Nicole B. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2243 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mary F.-R.
at trial to support the jury's findings. We also affirm on the evidentiary issue because Mary F.‑R.'s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
at trial to support the jury's findings. We also affirm on the evidentiary issue because Mary F.‑R.'s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mary F.-R.
.-R.'s argument is improperly developed.2 On July 20, 1995, Mary F.-R. resided on the porch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9700 - 2017-09-19
.-R.'s argument is improperly developed.2 On July 20, 1995, Mary F.-R. resided on the porch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9700 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that contained the recorded statements of a child witness, B.C.’s six-year-old son, X.Y.; (2) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
that contained the recorded statements of a child witness, B.C.’s six-year-old son, X.Y.; (2) trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2010
Jefferson TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010 9:45 a.m. 09AP567-CR State v. Miguel E. Marinez, Jr. 10:45
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
Jefferson TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010 9:45 a.m. 09AP567-CR State v. Miguel E. Marinez, Jr. 10:45
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
-Appellant, Peter Diamantopoulos, Defendant, David J. Zagrzebski and Barbara Zagrzebski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
-Appellant, Peter Diamantopoulos, Defendant, David J. Zagrzebski and Barbara Zagrzebski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
BARKOULIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, PETER DIAMANTOPOULOS, DEFENDANT, DAVID J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15
BARKOULIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, PETER DIAMANTOPOULOS, DEFENDANT, DAVID J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15