Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 74828 for public records.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 74828 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
Supervision that Metcalfe signed on June 29, 2004, are not part of the record. The Rules he signed on July 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
Supervision that Metcalfe signed on June 29, 2004, are not part of the record. The Rules he signed on July 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31768 - 2008-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
be able to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
be able to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the court in its original order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
by the court in its original order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108226 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10491 - 2017-09-20
. Nos. 96-0663-CR, 96-0664-CR 96-0665-CR, 96- 0666-CR -3- The facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10491 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Dean Heike v. Dan Hawk
. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). As the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15153 - 2017-09-21
. v. City of Madison, 81 Wis.2d 205, 208, 260 N.W.2d 251, 253 (1977). As the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15153 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
has not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that would have allowed for a motion to suppress Higgenbottom’s cell phone records. ¶6 One year later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
that would have allowed for a motion to suppress Higgenbottom’s cell phone records. ¶6 One year later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162152 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162152 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106256 - 2014-01-07
] Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106256 - 2014-01-07