Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 46471 - 46480 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. Reginald E. Sims
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922348 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195910 - 2017-09-21
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195910 - 2017-09-21
State v. Reginald E. Sims
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
motion was filed on July 9, 2002, in the robbery case.[2] The circuit court denied the motion on August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7544 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Smith
because “the defendant has deemed by his own actions that the case proceed accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9387 - 2005-03-31
because “the defendant has deemed by his own actions that the case proceed accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9387 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 184. In that case, the circuit court changed custody from joint to sole, even though no party had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
.2d 184. In that case, the circuit court changed custody from joint to sole, even though no party had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
Town of West Bend v. Washington County
presented in the case as whether the authority granted to a county to zone and rezone its own land is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18518 - 2005-06-14
presented in the case as whether the authority granted to a county to zone and rezone its own land is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18518 - 2005-06-14
[PDF]
Joseph Schultz v. City of Cumberland
- and that the facts of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19
- and that the facts of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Parent
with a copy of the record. By previous order in this case, we rejected that argument. The more specific law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24
with a copy of the record. By previous order in this case, we rejected that argument. The more specific law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24