Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46481 - 46490 of 59699 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 46481 - 46490 of 59699 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, 152 Wis. 2d at 534 n.5.[3] ¶6 To the extent Lear’s argument could be construed as a claim his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2009-02-16
, 152 Wis. 2d at 534 n.5.[3] ¶6 To the extent Lear’s argument could be construed as a claim his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35549 - 2009-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig A. Schemberger
evidence. He claims that the affidavit underlying the search warrant was constitutionally defective under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10100 - 2005-03-31
evidence. He claims that the affidavit underlying the search warrant was constitutionally defective under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10100 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 827, 193 N.W.2d 665 (1972), Seeley attempts to circumvent the forfeiture rule by claiming that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120185 - 2014-08-25
, 827, 193 N.W.2d 665 (1972), Seeley attempts to circumvent the forfeiture rule by claiming that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120185 - 2014-08-25
State v. Carl J. Knapp
of a minor. Knapp asserts that the presentence report erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
of a minor. Knapp asserts that the presentence report erroneously claimed he admitted to such a conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9261 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, including any claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
, including any claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
State v. Nancy R. Lamon
the jury panel. The parties agree that to establish this claim Lamon must first make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
the jury panel. The parties agree that to establish this claim Lamon must first make a prima facie showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lance L. Egner
not and affirm. ¶2 We recently discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7154 - 2005-03-31
not and affirm. ¶2 We recently discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7154 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lance L. Egner
not and affirm. ¶2 We recently discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7153 - 2005-03-31
not and affirm. ¶2 We recently discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7153 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67019 - 2011-07-05