Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46491 - 46500 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 46491 - 46500 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
Joseph Schultz v. City of Cumberland
- and that the facts of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19
- and that the facts of this case do not justify revocation of his license. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8426 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael J. Parent
with a copy of the record. By previous order in this case, we rejected that argument. The more specific law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24
with a copy of the record. By previous order in this case, we rejected that argument. The more specific law
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24865 - 2006-04-24
State v. Clifton L. Watts
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecution’s theory of the case was that the appellants fired a rifle into the Shipp residence. The State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10487 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2005-06).[1] Neither had occurred in Martinez-Maza’s case at the time of his revocation. ¶5 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
) (2005-06).[1] Neither had occurred in Martinez-Maza’s case at the time of his revocation. ¶5 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29451 - 2007-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920874 - 2025-02-27
State v. Sidney Earl Rushing
counsel involved in the case, and its time limits are running at this point. You have been appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
counsel involved in the case, and its time limits are running at this point. You have been appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement under which he pled guilty in one case to one count of armed robbery as a repeater and guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08
agreement under which he pled guilty in one case to one count of armed robbery as a repeater and guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=385482 - 2021-07-08
State v. Brian Mallory
in some cases on equitable grounds—where a petitioner timely asks counsel to file for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6629 - 2005-03-31
in some cases on equitable grounds—where a petitioner timely asks counsel to file for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6629 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
] motion to reopen a case he finished serving the sentence on in 1995. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140030 - 2015-04-21
] motion to reopen a case he finished serving the sentence on in 1995. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140030 - 2015-04-21