Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4651 - 4660 of 12227 for 2012.
Search results 4651 - 4660 of 12227 for 2012.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of 2 The order entered March 1, 2012, extended Jeffrey’s commitment for twelve months. The order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95287 - 2014-09-15
of 2 The order entered March 1, 2012, extended Jeffrey’s commitment for twelve months. The order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95287 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
(2009-10).[1] In our order of November 20, 2012, we identified an issue that required further review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91782 - 2013-01-15
(2009-10).[1] In our order of November 20, 2012, we identified an issue that required further review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91782 - 2013-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Buckner’s postconviction motion. Id. The Wisconsin Supreme Court denied review. ¶3 In 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
Buckner’s postconviction motion. Id. The Wisconsin Supreme Court denied review. ¶3 In 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92401 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, unpublished op. and order (WI App Feb. 15, 2012). Moffett subsequently filed a pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97661 - 2014-09-15
, unpublished op. and order (WI App Feb. 15, 2012). Moffett subsequently filed a pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97661 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
restrictions which were then in effect. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶46, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817 N.W.2d 848
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722180 - 2023-10-31
restrictions which were then in effect. See State v. Soto, 2012 WI 93, ¶46, 343 Wis. 2d 43, 817 N.W.2d 848
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722180 - 2023-10-31
CA Blank Order
years later, on October 22, 2012, Buss filed a pro se motion seeking additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101470 - 2013-09-03
years later, on October 22, 2012, Buss filed a pro se motion seeking additional sentence credit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101470 - 2013-09-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 13, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83503 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 13, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83503 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. (2011-2012). AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:32:23-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
. (2011-2012). AppealNo AddtlCap Panel2 2014-09-15T18:32:23-0500 CCAP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81185 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81185 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the current postconviction motion in 2010. The court denied the motion in 2012. Smiley first argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107407 - 2017-09-21
the current postconviction motion in 2010. The court denied the motion in 2012. Smiley first argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107407 - 2017-09-21