Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4651 - 4660 of 82976 for case search.
Search results 4651 - 4660 of 82976 for case search.
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7708 - 2005-03-31
the plastic bag. A subsequent inventory search of the bag disclosed two handguns, substantial quantities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7708 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34883 - 2014-09-15
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34883 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2013-02-26
The constitutionality of a search and seizure is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34883 - 2013-02-26
Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For the public - Self-help law center
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/services/public/selfhelp/selfrep/incourt.htm - 2026-01-16
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/services/public/selfhelp/selfrep/incourt.htm - 2026-01-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of the search that revealed the videotape, and thus the search was not a valid search incident to arrest. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
of the search that revealed the videotape, and thus the search was not a valid search incident to arrest. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and obtained Coleman’s consent to search the apartment for two reasons: (1) to ensure that everyone left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190859 - 2017-09-21
and obtained Coleman’s consent to search the apartment for two reasons: (1) to ensure that everyone left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190859 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shalamar Bursinger
executed a search warrant at 2520-22 West Mitchell Street. This was a two-story residence, with living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
executed a search warrant at 2520-22 West Mitchell Street. This was a two-story residence, with living
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19778 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
State v. Minko Lewis
submitted in support of the search warrant resulting in his arrest contained statements that were made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
submitted in support of the search warrant resulting in his arrest contained statements that were made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence of marijuana found on his person during a weapons pat-down. We conclude that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11
to suppress evidence of marijuana found on his person during a weapons pat-down. We conclude that the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32070 - 2008-03-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
on his person during a weapons pat-down. We conclude that the search was constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32070 - 2014-09-15
on his person during a weapons pat-down. We conclude that the search was constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32070 - 2014-09-15