Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4651 - 4660 of 58328 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Timothy T. Llewellyn v. M&S Transportation, Inc
. Llewellyn (Terry), by his guardian ad litem, and his parents, appeal from the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12357 - 2017-09-21

Shirley Madrigrano v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.
of Shirley Madrigrano. Wisconsin Bell contends that the trial court was without subject matter jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2525 - 2005-03-31

State v. James H.
to the percentage standard established under Wis. Stat. § 49.22 (1999-2000).[1] James claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31

Michael J. Glunz v. Laura A. Sokol
challenges two property division rulings of the trial court. First, she claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2605 - 2005-03-31

Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03

[PDF] Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
a judgment awarding damages of $8515.15 to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Rohini Avvaru v. Gerald D. O'Marro
. They claim that the trial court erred in not granting them default judgment against O’Marro because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11023 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
the physical placement of one of his sons and modifying child support. We affirm the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Michael J. Glunz v. Laura A. Sokol
and Michael J. Glunz. No. 00-1310 2 Sokol challenges two property division rulings of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2605 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James J. Krispin
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4293 - 2017-09-19