Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46501 - 46510 of 59511 for quit claim deed.

State v. Gregory K. Scott
, with respect to Scott's claim that there is no factual basis to support the charge, he has failed to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11598 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
and intelligently made. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 257, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92790 - 2013-02-11

State v. Carl A. Knoll
where Miller found him. He claims “absolutely no evidence [was] introduced as to how [he] had gotten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13104 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marathon County v. Vicki L.B.
. 1979), requiring the preservation of the testimony of trial counsel as a prerequisite to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12312 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Leroy Bryant
expectation of privacy in the invaded place.”’”). In order to claim his constitutional protections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14243 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
predated the Scott holding. There is no arguable merit to a claim that trial counsel should have appealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342958 - 2021-03-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Miller’s claims. 1 All subsequent references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106242 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Josephson renews his postconviction motion arguments, additionally claiming that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462879 - 2021-12-15

[PDF] David A. Schlemm v. Matthew Frank
for a due process claim is Chavis v. Rowe, 643 F.2d 1281 (7th Cir. 1981). However, in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19277 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
with prejudice. He claimed pendency of the charges adversely affected his custody classification, denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104801 - 2013-11-25