Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46511 - 46520 of 59285 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 46511 - 46520 of 59285 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are insufficient to constitute a valid exercise of discretion. He contends that the court’s “one-line claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
are insufficient to constitute a valid exercise of discretion. He contends that the court’s “one-line claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644968 - 2023-04-18
State v. Peter T. Kupaza
from a dog trainer who claimed her dog was able to identify human blood that could not be detected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25283 - 2006-05-24
from a dog trainer who claimed her dog was able to identify human blood that could not be detected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25283 - 2006-05-24
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its discretion when it sentenced Carpenter to six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its discretion when it sentenced Carpenter to six
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105187 - 2013-12-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the lack of the deportation warning because Keys
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
be no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the lack of the deportation warning because Keys
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159817 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Fifer’s pleas were anything other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
that there is no arguable merit to seeking plea withdrawal based on a claim that Fifer’s pleas were anything other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20
State v. Peter R. Burgeson
clarification.[2] He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the sentence imposed was to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
clarification.[2] He claims the trial court erred in concluding that the sentence imposed was to run
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13136 - 2005-03-31
Margaret S. Frafjord v. Travis C. Frafjord
Foix wanted allocated. For these reasons, we reject this claim. ¶5 Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24925 - 2006-04-26
Foix wanted allocated. For these reasons, we reject this claim. ¶5 Finally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24925 - 2006-04-26
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
. 1984). In his response to the report, Ratcliff adds a claim of prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
. 1984). In his response to the report, Ratcliff adds a claim of prosecutorial misconduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven T. Miller
, the State argues, “the only restitution issue before this court is Miller's claim that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
, the State argues, “the only restitution issue before this court is Miller's claim that the court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10936 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
… claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140030 - 2017-09-21
… claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation of the U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140030 - 2017-09-21