Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46531 - 46540 of 69439 for as he.
Search results 46531 - 46540 of 69439 for as he.
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
. In this consolidated appeal Bernhardt C. Thompson asserts the trial court erred when it found he was a repeater under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
. In this consolidated appeal Bernhardt C. Thompson asserts the trial court erred when it found he was a repeater under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shelbie Sue Schultz
. Here, Schultz's trial counsel admitted that he had been ineffective counsel in three ways: he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12429 - 2010-03-31
. Here, Schultz's trial counsel admitted that he had been ineffective counsel in three ways: he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12429 - 2010-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that while the evidence might not make much difference to the defense generally, he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24
that while the evidence might not make much difference to the defense generally, he should be allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24
State v. Tdurado Jacques Head
. Head contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney was unaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2013-11-19
. Head contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney was unaware
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13574 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
WI 12
vetoes violate § 10(1)(b) because the governor did not veto the bill “in part” when he extended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944606 - 2025-06-03
vetoes violate § 10(1)(b) because the governor did not veto the bill “in part” when he extended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944606 - 2025-06-03
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2022
he was charged with OWI and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration above
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483626 - 2022-02-09
he was charged with OWI and operating a motor vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration above
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483626 - 2022-02-09
Bradley A. Hackl v. Cody Hackl
at the death of the nonemploye spouse if he or she predeceases the employe spouse.” Section 766.62(5), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15174 - 2005-03-31
at the death of the nonemploye spouse if he or she predeceases the employe spouse.” Section 766.62(5), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15174 - 2005-03-31
State v. Zebelum Smith
).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4095 - 2005-03-31
).[1] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Johnson
a single victim. He challenges two of the convictions--intercourse with an unconscious person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8743 - 2017-09-19
a single victim. He challenges two of the convictions--intercourse with an unconscious person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8743 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jamerrel Everett
Everett raises three issues on appeal. First, he contends that the delinquency petition was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21
Everett raises three issues on appeal. First, he contends that the delinquency petition was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14846 - 2017-09-21