Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46541 - 46550 of 84336 for case number.
Search results 46541 - 46550 of 84336 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and adjourned the case for sentencing.[2] ¶5 After sentencing, Geyer filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
, and adjourned the case for sentencing.[2] ¶5 After sentencing, Geyer filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107613 - 2014-06-04
State v. Ernest L. Smith
and ordered that "Mr. Smith's case be treated as a forfeiture violation." ANALYSIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11138 - 2005-03-31
and ordered that "Mr. Smith's case be treated as a forfeiture violation." ANALYSIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
(citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 651 (1992)). In a misdemeanor case in Wisconsin, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
(citing Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 651 (1992)). In a misdemeanor case in Wisconsin, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5602 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Clarence E. Hill
given in this case were included within the charged offense. Second, the trial court must analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
given in this case were included within the charged offense. Second, the trial court must analyze
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8344 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Kluck
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9518 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9518 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
(Wis. 2000), a case with facts almost identical to Miller’s case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
(Wis. 2000), a case with facts almost identical to Miller’s case, the Wisconsin Supreme Court held: We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Matthew D.B.
not provide the trial court with the authority to order him to pay restitution in this case because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2344 - 2017-09-19
not provide the trial court with the authority to order him to pay restitution in this case because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2344 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
insufficient probable cause. Id. ¶11 Probable cause is determined on a case-by-case basis considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
insufficient probable cause. Id. ¶11 Probable cause is determined on a case-by-case basis considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2013-08-13
[PDF]
St. John's Home of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
in this case. The net effect of the second proposal would be that interest income from any and all sources
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11485 - 2017-09-19
in this case. The net effect of the second proposal would be that interest income from any and all sources
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11485 - 2017-09-19
Adam Austin-White v. Todd C. Young
2005 WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0943 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7445 - 2005-03-31
2005 WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-0943 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7445 - 2005-03-31