Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46551 - 46560 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46551 - 46560 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
State v. Bridget P.
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6961 - 2005-03-31
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6961 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).[1] In this case, the guardianship petition was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83344 - 2012-06-04
“shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).[1] In this case, the guardianship petition was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83344 - 2012-06-04
2007 WI 21
2007 WI 21 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP2458-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28172 - 2007-02-15
2007 WI 21 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP2458-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28172 - 2007-02-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
State v. Patricia A. Weed
716 (1997), claiming that these cases effectively overruled State v. Simpson, 185 Wis. 2d 772, 519 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
716 (1997), claiming that these cases effectively overruled State v. Simpson, 185 Wis. 2d 772, 519 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4032 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donald W. Burchfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0716-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15267 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0716-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15267 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey L. Sheets
device or immobilization is mandatory, not discretionary. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8853 - 2005-03-31
device or immobilization is mandatory, not discretionary. In this case, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawanda McDowell v. Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc.
. I request that you allow the additional time. The case is still months away from trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11283 - 2017-09-19
. I request that you allow the additional time. The case is still months away from trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11283 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bridget P.
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6962 - 2005-03-31
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6962 - 2005-03-31
Bronsteatter & Sons, Inc. v. American Growers Insurance Company
2005 WI App 192 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP115 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19126 - 2005-08-30
2005 WI App 192 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP115 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19126 - 2005-08-30