Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46551 - 46560 of 48550 for her.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to show that a second prosecution subjected him or her to double jeopardy, the charges must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334301 - 2021-02-17

[PDF] State v. Brandon J. Matke
). The court concluded, however, that a defendant could avoid having the jury learn of his or her prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6804 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] League of Women Voters v. Madison Community Foundation
. Prior to her recusal, she had concluded: “[T]he standards set forth in § 701.10(2)(b), Stats., apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19925 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Norman C. Danielson v. City of Sun Prairie
provide the owner or his or her representative with copies of applicable pamphlets prepared under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16121 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 12
, approaches an individual, the individual has a right to ignore the police and go about his [or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485122 - 2022-04-11

[PDF] State v. Stanley Lee Felton
. As we have explained: Under Rule 907.02, STATS., a person may give an opinion within his or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9649 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Andre S. Fuller
remaining of his or her sentence is converted into extended supervision, and he or she is released
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24831 - 2017-09-21

Midwest Energy Resources Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
was based on her erroneous reading of Wis. Admin. Code § NR 440.42(1). ¶5 Midwest applied for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20540 - 2005-12-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. In addition to the rationale that an officer should not be able to avoid liability for his or her personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49566 - 2010-05-03

COURT OF APPEALS
-action, and (4) which is to his or her detriment.” Village of Hobart v. Brown County, 2005 WI 78, ¶36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86397 - 2012-08-22