Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46551 - 46560 of 76616 for judgment for u s.
Search results 46551 - 46560 of 76616 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110177 - 2017-09-21
the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
and ordered No. 2010AP2175 4 to participate in the program under s. 938.34(4h).” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61050 - 2014-09-15
and ordered No. 2010AP2175 4 to participate in the program under s. 938.34(4h).” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61050 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
. This section does not apply to proceedings under s. 48.21 or 48.213. [3] Wisconsin Stat. § 48.422(5) reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
. This section does not apply to proceedings under s. 48.21 or 48.213. [3] Wisconsin Stat. § 48.422(5) reads
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and on the officer, official, agent or employee under s. 801.11. Failure to give the requisite notice shall not bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26795 - 2006-10-17
and on the officer, official, agent or employee under s. 801.11. Failure to give the requisite notice shall not bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26795 - 2006-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with an earlier sentence,” already completed at the time of sentencing in the current case, because “we s[aw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149025 - 2017-09-21
with an earlier sentence,” already completed at the time of sentencing in the current case, because “we s[aw
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149025 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
probation. State v. Hardwick, 144 Wis. 2d 54, 59, 422 N.W.2d 922 (Ct. App. 1988). “[B]oth the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
probation. State v. Hardwick, 144 Wis. 2d 54, 59, 422 N.W.2d 922 (Ct. App. 1988). “[B]oth the [S]tate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48823 - 2010-04-12
State v. Ray A. Schiller
, cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2003 WL 98460 (U.S. Jan. 13, 2003) (No. 02-6652), that the standard jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31
, cert. denied, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2003 WL 98460 (U.S. Jan. 13, 2003) (No. 02-6652), that the standard jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donnis J.
at school on April 15, Julius approached him and told him “don’t go over there where the G.D.’s are … go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13781 - 2014-09-15
at school on April 15, Julius approached him and told him “don’t go over there where the G.D.’s are … go
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13781 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
artfully the defendant may rephrase the issue[s].” [State v. Witkowski, 163 Wis. 2d 985, 990, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
artfully the defendant may rephrase the issue[s].” [State v. Witkowski, 163 Wis. 2d 985, 990, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
artfully the defendant may rephrase the issue[s].” [State v. Witkowski, 163 Wis. 2d 985, 990, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
artfully the defendant may rephrase the issue[s].” [State v. Witkowski, 163 Wis. 2d 985, 990, 473 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13