Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46571 - 46580 of 83431 for simple case search.
Search results 46571 - 46580 of 83431 for simple case search.
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[2] We affirm because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[2] We affirm because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96079 - 2013-04-30
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
Watkins’ claim that the sealed submission prevented him from adequately presenting his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
Watkins’ claim that the sealed submission prevented him from adequately presenting his case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
[PDF]
Cheri S. v. Crystal C.
, 539 N.W.2d 98, 102 (1995). The issue in this case is whether § 938.25, STATS., permits a parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
, 539 N.W.2d 98, 102 (1995). The issue in this case is whether § 938.25, STATS., permits a parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randolph M. Martin
. This court rejects Martin’s contention. ¶6 It is undisputed in this case that the issue of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
. This court rejects Martin’s contention. ¶6 It is undisputed in this case that the issue of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Owczynsky filed a response, and counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463600 - 2021-12-16
, Owczynsky filed a response, and counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=463600 - 2021-12-16
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
credit case. Jackie Green claims that he is entitled to forty-one days’ sentence credit on an eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
credit case. Jackie Green claims that he is entitled to forty-one days’ sentence credit on an eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159272 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John Casteel
are law of the case and that Casteel’s sentence was not harsh or unconscionable. We reject Casteel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14220 - 2014-09-15
are law of the case and that Casteel’s sentence was not harsh or unconscionable. We reject Casteel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14220 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jimmy Bridges v. Gerald Berge
in this case. However, that document was not signed or entered by the court, and for that reason we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19
in this case. However, that document was not signed or entered by the court, and for that reason we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2761 - 2017-09-19
Larry C. Olson v. Charles H. Thompson
and nonspecific duties are discretionary, that is not always the case. See Larsen v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13310 - 2005-03-31
and nonspecific duties are discretionary, that is not always the case. See Larsen v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13310 - 2005-03-31