Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4661 - 4670 of 68969 for had.

[PDF] Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
and his company, Van Buren Management, Inc., and Checota and Universal Medical. Lee and Checota had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Catherine M. Parrilli
on the steering wheel and sat still. ΒΆ4 Nelson opened the door to the car and asked if Parrilli had her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17867 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
field sobriety tests. We conclude that even without the first PBT, the officer had ample suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106876 - 2014-01-21

COURT OF APPEALS
department at the time of the initial stop, had the requisite reasonable suspicion. We therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78071 - 2012-02-14

[PDF] Village of Elm Grove v. Laura L. Gillilan
that the Village had failed to prove an essential element of its case, namely, that the person present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15223 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Chiropractic Association v. State of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board
of Wisconsin Chiropractic Examining Board, having been appointed in 1993, and he had been elected chair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6353 - 2017-09-19

State v. Shannon Buettner
the jury ultimately would have had to resolve was whether the stabbing was justified. The jury would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11825 - 2005-03-31

State v. Lance R. Ward
of marijuana. The Crime Stopper had seen marijuana in the house of Derrell Vance. On 11-29-96 a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shannon Buettner
that the issue the jury ultimately would have had to resolve was whether the stabbing was justified. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11825 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. In support of his motion, Jenkins argued that his former counsel had not timely filed a notice of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14