Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4661 - 4670 of 6139 for sheriff.
Search results 4661 - 4670 of 6139 for sheriff.
State v. Jack E. Thurk
occurred, Sergeant Don Morey of the Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13561 - 2005-03-31
occurred, Sergeant Don Morey of the Waupaca County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13561 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion. ¶3 At the suppression hearing, sheriff’s deputy Adam Olson testified he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121152 - 2015-01-25
suspicion. ¶3 At the suppression hearing, sheriff’s deputy Adam Olson testified he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121152 - 2015-01-25
Mitchell Bank v. Thomas G. Schanke
seized and sold at a sheriff’s sale on June 13, 1988. Schanke was the only bidder and purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4072 - 2005-03-31
seized and sold at a sheriff’s sale on June 13, 1988. Schanke was the only bidder and purchased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
throughout White’s cell. Upon investigation by the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
throughout White’s cell. Upon investigation by the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
9 Jones also sets forth that when he talked to one of the sheriff deputies, he was told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
9 Jones also sets forth that when he talked to one of the sheriff deputies, he was told
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194955 - 2017-09-21
State v. Fred J. Odell
SHERIFF CHARGE PAPER TYP: COMPLAINT INITIAL CT DATE: 01/31/92 AGENCY CASE NO.: 247512 JUDGE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31
SHERIFF CHARGE PAPER TYP: COMPLAINT INITIAL CT DATE: 01/31/92 AGENCY CASE NO.: 247512 JUDGE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9552 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
county sheriff’s deputies responded. ¶3 Haizel grew more upset with their arrival. He fired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
county sheriff’s deputies responded. ¶3 Haizel grew more upset with their arrival. He fired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103615 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Ronald S. Greene
, and that the sheriff was unable to serve them. Id. at 386, 184 N.W.2d at 178. He asked for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13162 - 2017-09-21
, and that the sheriff was unable to serve them. Id. at 386, 184 N.W.2d at 178. He asked for a continuance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13162 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
along to the sheriff’s department. Id. Based upon the complaint, this court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479499 - 2022-02-03
along to the sheriff’s department. Id. Based upon the complaint, this court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479499 - 2022-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution. ¶3 At the suppression hearing, the arresting officer, Deputy Sheriff David Sabot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137235 - 2015-02-08
Constitution. ¶3 At the suppression hearing, the arresting officer, Deputy Sheriff David Sabot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137235 - 2015-02-08