Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4661 - 4670 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 4661 - 4670 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Jeramey J. Byrge
was not competent to participate in the proceedings; (2) the plea colloquy was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13229 - 2017-09-21
was not competent to participate in the proceedings; (2) the plea colloquy was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13229 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James J. Krispin
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4293 - 2017-09-19
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4293 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Paul Fochs v. John Buch
on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1) Fochs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13928 - 2014-09-15
on him and broke his back. They argue that they are entitled to a new trial because: (1) Fochs’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michael J. Glunz v. Laura A. Sokol
and Michael J. Glunz. No. 00-1310 2 Sokol challenges two property division rulings of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2605 - 2017-09-19
and Michael J. Glunz. No. 00-1310 2 Sokol challenges two property division rulings of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
a judgment awarding damages of $8515.15 to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
a judgment awarding damages of $8515.15 to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
to the respondent, Margaret Laubert, following a trial to the court. We affirm the judgment. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
State v. Delores R.
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4057 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated her parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4057 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the physical placement of one of his sons and modifying child support. We affirm the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
the physical placement of one of his sons and modifying child support. We affirm the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
State v. James H.
to the percentage standard established under Wis. Stat. § 49.22 (1999-2000).[1] James claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
to the percentage standard established under Wis. Stat. § 49.22 (1999-2000).[1] James claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
State v. James J. Krispin
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, argues that the trial court erred by failing to grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4293 - 2005-03-31