Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46601 - 46610 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 46601 - 46610 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 184. In that case, the circuit court changed custody from joint to sole, even though no party had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
.2d 184. In that case, the circuit court changed custody from joint to sole, even though no party had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30401 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=517947 - 2022-05-05
Daniel D. Drow v. David H. Schwarz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2010-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1867
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12686 - 2010-12-20
CA Blank Order
rule requires citation to cases, statutes, and facts in the record supporting counsel’s conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103475 - 2013-10-22
rule requires citation to cases, statutes, and facts in the record supporting counsel’s conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103475 - 2013-10-22
[PDF]
WI 41
2013 WI 41 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP133-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96911 - 2014-09-15
2013 WI 41 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP133-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randolph M. Martin
. This court rejects Martin’s contention. ¶6 It is undisputed in this case that the issue of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
. This court rejects Martin’s contention. ¶6 It is undisputed in this case that the issue of Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6327 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
and reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=533054 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
State v. James A. Smith
. 1 Smith previously filed an appeal in case No. 95-0646-CR, with appointed appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9387 - 2017-09-19
. 1 Smith previously filed an appeal in case No. 95-0646-CR, with appointed appellate counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9387 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Cheri S. v. Crystal C.
, 539 N.W.2d 98, 102 (1995). The issue in this case is whether § 938.25, STATS., permits a parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
, 539 N.W.2d 98, 102 (1995). The issue in this case is whether § 938.25, STATS., permits a parent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13331 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103086 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103086 - 2017-09-21