Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46611 - 46620 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46611 - 46620 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
: “In the (hopefully) rare cases where a document would otherwise constitute the final document, but for not including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
: “In the (hopefully) rare cases where a document would otherwise constitute the final document, but for not including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170630 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170630 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI App 164
2008 WI App 164 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34178 - 2008-11-11
2008 WI App 164 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2687-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34178 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
requires us to apply the implied consent statute to the facts of a particular case. This is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13295 - 2017-09-21
requires us to apply the implied consent statute to the facts of a particular case. This is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 On May 17, 2022
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233103 - 2019-01-23
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233103 - 2019-01-23
COURT OF APPEALS
if it can be shown that prejudice resulted from an arbitrary decision. This was not the case here. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
if it can be shown that prejudice resulted from an arbitrary decision. This was not the case here. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
State v. Steven Schelk
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The OWI, PAC and possession charges were filed in two separate cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980070 - 2025-07-09
State v. James Darius Jones
not apply to the situation in this case. Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 (1968); California v. Green, 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6561 - 2005-03-31
not apply to the situation in this case. Barber v. Page, 390 U.S. 719, 725 (1968); California v. Green, 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6561 - 2005-03-31