Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46641 - 46650 of 69211 for as he.

[PDF] NOTICE
that when Omarion came to Boomland on the morning of August 30 he had no physical injuries. When she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36294 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
notice of appeal states that he also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239496 - 2019-04-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion for resentencing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197783 - 2017-10-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
program because he was not near his mandatory release date. In 2011, he again claimed a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186890 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, because Moore’s motion is meritless. ¶5 Moore’s fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62865 - 2014-09-15

State v. Scott E. Frye
, and other counted convictions equals four, whereas, he contended, the applicable penalty is contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6571 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
remedy had he prevailed on certiorari review would have been another parole hearing, which was already
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106123 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, at approximately 10:00 p.m., the investigator conducted undercover surveillance at 1203A Kentucky Avenue. He saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71130 - 2014-09-15

State v. Thomas E. Dahl
was drawn and tested without his consent. Although he acknowledges that express consent is not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3637 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
trial counsel was ineffective because he did not challenge the admissibility of incriminating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28512 - 2014-09-15