Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46641 - 46650 of 55935 for n y c.
Search results 46641 - 46650 of 55935 for n y c.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. STAT. RULE 809.10(4). No. 2008AP232 6 § 767.59(1f)(c)1. As provided in § 767.59(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. RULE 809.10(4). No. 2008AP232 6 § 767.59(1f)(c)1. As provided in § 767.59(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tonda K. McQuinn
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). Additionally, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2719 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (1997-98). Additionally, all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
1 Mallek cites WIS. STAT. § 241.02(1)(c) (2003-04). However, this statute is irrelevant since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
1 Mallek cites WIS. STAT. § 241.02(1)(c) (2003-04). However, this statute is irrelevant since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17961 - 2017-09-21
State v. Craig A. Zempel
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats. [2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14285 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
)(c), (e) and (h) (2007-08). Apprendi applies to penalties over the prescribed statutory maximum. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
)(c), (e) and (h) (2007-08). Apprendi applies to penalties over the prescribed statutory maximum. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52620 - 2010-07-27
CA Blank Order
before us that the evidence was not in the government’s possession. See §§ 974.07(2)(b), (2)(c), and (7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
before us that the evidence was not in the government’s possession. See §§ 974.07(2)(b), (2)(c), and (7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137519 - 2015-03-11
State v. Timothy J. Lee
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11215 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Section 971.06(1)(c), Stats.; Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant does not claim innocence, but refuses to admit guilt. Section 971.06(1)(c), Stats.; Cross v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keyun Utsey
for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
for Milwaukee County: elsa c. lamelas, Judge. Affirmed. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Fine and Kessler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19728 - 2005-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, WI 54982-0490 Corey C. Chirafisi Chirafisi & Verhoff, S.C. 1 S. Pinckney St., Suite 952
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143245 - 2017-09-21
, WI 54982-0490 Corey C. Chirafisi Chirafisi & Verhoff, S.C. 1 S. Pinckney St., Suite 952
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143245 - 2017-09-21