Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46641 - 46650 of 82994 for simple case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counsel’s no-merit conclusion, appellate counsel’s two sentence conclusion, devoid of case law and facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252022 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had the case, as Judge Howard had retired. Cohan Lipp asked the court to revisit the “shared risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123492 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
be pursued on appeal. We therefore summarily affirm the judgment. As the victim in his case was taking out
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95944 - 2013-04-22

[PDF] NOTICE
for review to our supreme court and it accepted the case for review. The supreme court affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29207 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motions in two cases.[1] He additionally appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2011-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
be done at a de novo hearing, I think there is case law that suggests a de novo hearing is de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the maximum penalty for the underlying crime in felony murder cases is non-negotiable.” (Bolding, italics
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177878 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jo A. Kain
. ¶1 BROWN, P.J.[1] The first issue is whether the arresting officer in this OWI/BAC case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2778 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David J. Smith v. Herrling
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2262 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11227 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kenneth W. Raush
prior convictions.2 The facts of record in this case are undisputed. Whether the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10787 - 2017-09-20