Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46661 - 46670 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 46661 - 46670 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
not raise this argument in the motion for sentence modification from which this appeal is taken. A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134241 - 2015-02-02
not raise this argument in the motion for sentence modification from which this appeal is taken. A claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134241 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenge to his pleas. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23
challenge to his pleas. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336738 - 2021-02-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The Nielsens’ claim against Manteufel is not relevant to this appeal. No. 2010AP1852 3 DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62771 - 2014-09-15
. The Nielsens’ claim against Manteufel is not relevant to this appeal. No. 2010AP1852 3 DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62771 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. We remind no-merit counsel that unpreserved claims of error may still be reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
counsel. We remind no-merit counsel that unpreserved claims of error may still be reviewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mario Harris
assistance of counsel claim, this court applies the two-part test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16183 - 2017-09-21
assistance of counsel claim, this court applies the two-part test enunciated in Strickland v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Neu
4 ¶6 Moreover, nothing in the record supports Neu’s claim that he took the stand as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16044 - 2017-09-21
4 ¶6 Moreover, nothing in the record supports Neu’s claim that he took the stand as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16044 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
) (noting that “a defense attorney has a duty to advance all colorable claims and defenses” (quoted source
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165067 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Harris
defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13182 - 2017-09-21
defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See County of Racine v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13182 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803527 - 2024-05-22
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803527 - 2024-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude there is no arguable merit to a claim that the court should have granted the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219189 - 2018-09-19
conclude there is no arguable merit to a claim that the court should have granted the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219189 - 2018-09-19