Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46671 - 46680 of 58955 for do.

[PDF] National Association of Drug Court Professionals adult drug court planning process checklist
. Purpose of Screening □ Determine the presence and severity of substance abuse. □ Weed out persons who do
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/adultdrugcourtplancheck.pdf - 2021-09-23

[PDF] Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (Whitford et al.)
the “least-change” approach. Should we do so? And if not, what approach should we use?” Order
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motionamicuswhitford.pdf - 2021-10-25

[PDF] Order - 2021AP1450-OA Johnson v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
to modify existing maps using a "least- change" approach. Should we do so, and if not, what approach
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/2021AP1450o8.pdf - 2021-11-17

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 19-02 - Comments from Court of Appeals Staff Attorneys
and what are the real costs with doing so. The debate on these questions can be avoided by requiring
/supreme/docs/1902commentcoastaffattys.pdf - 2019-03-20

[PDF] Supreme Court rule petition 21-06 - Supporting memo
of firearms by those who are statutorily authorized to do so. Staffing The Subcommittee did not review
/supreme/docs/2106memo.pdf - 2021-10-21

[PDF] Supreme Court rule 1605 Appendix A
the requirements of the Section 4. Any party filing a reconsideration motion under this Section 8 must do so
/supreme/docs/1605appa.pdf - 2016-10-26

[PDF] Comments on Supreme Court rule 16-01 - Ingrisano and Smies
challenge; less affluent person often do not. As a result, the generally less affluent people litigating
/supreme/docs/1601commentingrisanosmies.pdf - 2016-10-03

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 11-08 supporting memo
waiver provision (SCR 40.10) and to assess their qualifications for doing so under a “totality
/supreme/docs/1108petitionsupport.pdf - 2011-11-21

[PDF] Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts three new cases
. Issues granted: 1. Do the existing state legislative maps violate the contiguity requirements
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/ac102723.pdf - 2023-10-27

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - May 1 & 14, 2009
, among other things, that the referee’s findings do not support the legal conclusions that Schlieve has
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36371 - 2014-09-15