Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46671 - 46680 of 48560 for her.

2010 WI APP 144
. It is undisputed that none of the students appealing the denial of his or her open enrollment application has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54885 - 2010-10-26

COURT OF APPEALS
or her right to speedy trial, and (4) prejudice to the defendant. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d at 509 (citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58652 - 2011-01-11

[PDF] Joseph Mattila v. Employe Trust Funds Board
)(a), an employee must show that fifty-one percent or more of his or her duties involve “active law enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2405 - 2017-09-19

Midwest Energy Resources Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Administration
was based on her erroneous reading of Wis. Admin. Code § NR 440.42(1). ¶5 Midwest applied for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20540 - 2005-12-05

COURT OF APPEALS
offender shall be given credit toward the service of his or her sentence for all days spent in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32434 - 2025-04-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evicted Evans from her apartment, making Evans a visitor or trespasser when King attacked him; 3 and (7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106756 - 2017-09-21

Milwaukee County v. Ronald L. Collison
property to clean up any contaminants on his or her property. See Wis. Stat. § 292.11 (2003‑04).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24879 - 2006-04-24

Ronald A. Arthur v. Hanson & Leja Lumber
on the false statement to his or her detriment. Merten v. Nathan, 108 Wis. 2d 205, 209 n.2, 321 N.W.2d 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14366 - 2013-05-12

Joseph Mattila v. Employe Trust Funds Board
or her duties involve “active law enforcement.” It further determined that the duties of a jailer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2405 - 2012-08-20

A. Ronald Wulf v. Township of Montello
or her property will be benefited [thereby]….” Section 60.71(4)(c). That is the hearing for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11107 - 2013-06-27