Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46681 - 46690 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 46681 - 46690 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
State v. Brent R. Reed
. Background ¶2 This case arose out of a traffic investigation late one Saturday night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
. Background ¶2 This case arose out of a traffic investigation late one Saturday night
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26248 - 2006-08-16
[PDF]
Town of Union v. City of Eau Claire
2003 WI App 161 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3393-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6003 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 161 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-3393-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6003 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677067 - 2023-07-11
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677067 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117168 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117168 - 2017-09-21
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
judge hear the case. Rochelle stated she understood. ¶5 The circuit court accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3703 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to as the “1977 Fence.” Another landmark relevant to this case is a monument, referred to as the Harrison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134443 - 2017-09-21
to as the “1977 Fence.” Another landmark relevant to this case is a monument, referred to as the Harrison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134443 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667679 - 2023-06-13
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667679 - 2023-06-13
State v. Bridget P.
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6961 - 2005-03-31
court took testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6961 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) and cases interpreting that statute ….”[3] State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d, 783, 793, 496 N.W.2d 701 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33049 - 2008-06-16
) and cases interpreting that statute ….”[3] State v. Coolidge, 173 Wis. 2d, 783, 793, 496 N.W.2d 701 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33049 - 2008-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
“shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).[1] In this case, the guardianship petition was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83344 - 2012-06-04
“shall be heard within 90 days after it is filed”).[1] In this case, the guardianship petition was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83344 - 2012-06-04