Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4671 - 4680 of 15281 for 2013.
Search results 4671 - 4680 of 15281 for 2013.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21
counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14), 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disposition and affirm the order. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162393 - 2017-09-21
disposition and affirm the order. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162393 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did not give notice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05
. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We affirm the circuit court because Keniston did not give notice
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141127 - 2015-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
had competency to hear and decide the petition. We affirm. ¶2 The Wis. Stat. § 54.34 (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140605 - 2015-04-28
had competency to hear and decide the petition. We affirm. ¶2 The Wis. Stat. § 54.34 (2013-14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140605 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14). 1 Based on our review of the record, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
a no-merit report under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14). 1 Based on our review of the record, we reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). No. 2015AP1996-CRNM 5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160008 - 2017-09-21
that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). No. 2015AP1996-CRNM 5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160008 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo-Puac received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo-Puac received a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146155 - 2015-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 2 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141369 - 2017-09-21
report seeking to withdraw as appellate counsel. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2013-14) 2 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141369 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to supplement a criminal defendant’s standard appellate and postconviction remedies. See State v. Starks, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-08
to supplement a criminal defendant’s standard appellate and postconviction remedies. See State v. Starks, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121180 - 2014-09-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, moved for relief from the judgment, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2013-14), 1 and for reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160012 - 2017-09-21
, moved for relief from the judgment, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.07 (2013-14), 1 and for reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160012 - 2017-09-21