Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4671 - 4680 of 7565 for ye.
Search results 4671 - 4680 of 7565 for ye.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: Did [Salgado] intend to do this? Yes, he intended to harm her at that time, and as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502282 - 2022-03-31
: Did [Salgado] intend to do this? Yes, he intended to harm her at that time, and as a result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502282 - 2022-03-31
State v. Ritchie H. Dumer
, false imprisonment, and battery of both [victims] on February 5 of this year?" Dumer answered, "Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
, false imprisonment, and battery of both [victims] on February 5 of this year?" Dumer answered, "Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and not enough to say yes.” Jorgensen concluded the March 26 No. 2012AP970-CR 6 meeting saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98789 - 2014-09-15
, and not enough to say yes.” Jorgensen concluded the March 26 No. 2012AP970-CR 6 meeting saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98789 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
been under subpoena, and Attorney Caspari responded, "Yes." The witness referenced by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172051 - 2017-09-21
been under subpoena, and Attorney Caspari responded, "Yes." The witness referenced by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172051 - 2017-09-21
State v. Diane M. Somers
Mrs. Somers is telling the truth when she says she was afraid to say yes to the request … because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
Mrs. Somers is telling the truth when she says she was afraid to say yes to the request … because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11460 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kathleen Jo Wade
for “police safety” reasons? We conclude that the answer is “yes” and therefore reject Kathleen Jo Wade’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11987 - 2005-03-31
for “police safety” reasons? We conclude that the answer is “yes” and therefore reject Kathleen Jo Wade’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
you Grandpa’s a sucker. Yes. I mean, a little girl is a little girl, whether they’re my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
you Grandpa’s a sucker. Yes. I mean, a little girl is a little girl, whether they’re my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentences would be concurrent. We answer issue one “yes” and issue two “no.” Nos. 2012AP2320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
sentences would be concurrent. We answer issue one “yes” and issue two “no.” Nos. 2012AP2320
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
did,'” and that Brown responded, “Yes, I did, sir.” Further, the court found that although Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10523 - 2017-09-20
did,'” and that Brown responded, “Yes, I did, sir.” Further, the court found that although Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10523 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Cleveland Brown, Jr.
did,'” and that Brown responded, “Yes, I did, sir.” Further, the court found that although Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20
did,'” and that Brown responded, “Yes, I did, sir.” Further, the court found that although Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10524 - 2017-09-20