Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 46721 - 46730 of 84377 for case number.
Search results 46721 - 46730 of 84377 for case number.
State v. Mark O. Williams
order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case began the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
order denying him six days’ sentencing credit, arguing that his custody in this case began the day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of conditions has no evidentiary value. Moreover, the bond in this case required Koeppen to submit to “orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
of conditions has no evidentiary value. Moreover, the bond in this case required Koeppen to submit to “orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a workplace injury. Nevertheless, the Commission stated “that point had not been reached in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
a workplace injury. Nevertheless, the Commission stated “that point had not been reached in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045151 - 2025-12-02
Advantage Leasing Corporation v. Novatech Solutions, Inc.
equipment, but needed financing. Advantage Leasing, the plaintiff in this case, provided financing to Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17885 - 2005-05-02
equipment, but needed financing. Advantage Leasing, the plaintiff in this case, provided financing to Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17885 - 2005-05-02
Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
2002 WI App 290 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0815 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5083 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 290 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0815 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Buck
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10713 - 2017-09-20
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10713 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
forth in WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b) applied because the case involved the sexual assault of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482056 - 2022-02-08
forth in WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b) applied because the case involved the sexual assault of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482056 - 2022-02-08
State v. Albert E. Morrow
The case proceeded to trial. Officer Riestra and the citizen were the only witnesses for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
The case proceeded to trial. Officer Riestra and the citizen were the only witnesses for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“effectively, six years, in bringing this suit” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139858 - 2017-09-21
“effectively, six years, in bringing this suit” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139858 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic relies in his effort to claim the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139858 - 2011-11-01
” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic relies in his effort to claim the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139858 - 2011-11-01